| Main knowledge bank page |
Recent additions |
Recent changes |
What links here |
Categories |
Category cloud How-to guides | Organisation profiles | Project profiles | ||||||||||
Scaling up
[top] [end]The place of pilotsSmall projects and pilots are vital in developing effective, sustainable household energy interventions. They can help us determine whether interventions are safe, effective, appropriate, demanded and saleable in "real life" conditions. We have a responsibility to ensure these in household energy interventions so that we do not damage people's health, waste their time and money, and lose their trust. However, without scaling up they only ever stand to benefit a few people.The Millennium Development Goals require us to take scaling up seriously and measure our successes in terms of reducing child mortality, improving maternal health, aiding access to education, reducing hunger and malnutrition and so on. What indicators do we use to measure the success of our interventions? Testing or proving a technology in the field may be very important, but are not enough. These goals challenge us to be braver in our objectives. Success should ultimately be measured by the (direct or indirect) contribution made to sustainable, widespread self-expanding benefits to the quality of life of the poor. [top] [end]Scaling up in Boiling Point 50The papers in this issue of Boiling Point describe many different situations, present many (sometimes opposing) opinions, and tell diverse stories from around the globe.Brewis describes developing a strong marketing strategy, brand building and paying commissions to sales staff, while Dutta describes how grant money is invested rather than just expended. With all its benefits, taking a business approach gives us the responsibility to ensure we are not merely delivering goods that waste people’s money. O’Neal presents a case for capitalintensive mass production of stoves in factories, which contrasts interestingly with Brewis’ findings that small workshops and a labour-intensive approach give a good compromise between quality and price. Karve also describes success through supporting entrepreneurs. Provision of finance and health impacts as advocacy messages are described in Acharya’s description of Scaling up biogas in Nepal, and Cecelski explores the impact of women’s status and the value of their labour. The theme of partnership emerges strongly: Brewis and Dutta stress the importance of embracing the skills of different partners, whilst Palit describes complex institutional partnerships. Mazzoni describes public – private partnerships as a vehicle to affordable electricity for the poor. [top] [end]Scaling up elsewhere...The following outlines some of the recommendations for scaling up resulting from research recently undertaken at WEDC:
This project involved pilot composting projects, but the themes shared are striking. [top] [end]CommunicationThere is considerable scope for cross learning between the energy, water, hygiene and sanitation sectors.The value of communication within the energy sector is highlighted in Owala’s paper. Honest communication is key to upscaling: no one can learn anything useful from a failed pilot described success, or from lessons learned in a project which are never shared. Boiling Point is an invaluable vehicle for sharing lessons learned, experiences and contributing to successful scaling up of household interventions for the benefit of the poor. [top] [end]Download the original article Theme editorial: Scaling up by Jonathan Rouse (83 KB)[top] [end]Contents: Boiling Point 50 - Scaling up and commercialisation of household energy initiatives
Categories: Boiling Point 50| Scaling Up | ||||||||||
Page created:
27 June 2007; Last edited:
08 September 2008; Version: 2 | ||||||||||
Pagename: ScalingUp @HEDON: | ||||||||||


Theme editorial: Scaling up by Jonathan Rouse (83 KB)