Main knowledge bank page |
Recent additions |
Recent changes |
What links here |
Categories |
Search the forum
How-to guides |
Organisation profiles |
Project profiles
The integrated approach to link household energy with other development objectives
Energie domestique et autres objectives de développement:
une approche intégrée
Cette étude de cas, a travers un projet pilote, montre comment des
impacts peuvent être atteints quand des mesures de conservation de
la biomasse sont intégrées dans des activités de développement
rural. L'article décrit les étapes logiques à mettre en oeuvre,
tire les leçons des expériences acquises ainsi que les moyens pour
renforcer la coopération entre les principales parties
prenantes. |
ProBEC is a regional programme aimed at improving the quality of
life for poor rural and urban people by enabling them to meet their
energy needs in a socially and environmentally sustainable manner.
It aims to do this by improving the links between governments and
development organisations in implementing integrated biomass energy
conservation (BEC) programmes.
ProBEC is a joint programme between SADC, the European Commission
(EC) and the German Government. The first phase (1998-2001) ProBEC
activities are restricted to six SADC countries: Lesotho, Malawi,
Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe (see BP43 page
20).
One of the major outputs of ProBEC is the implementation of BEC
demonstration projects, which are intended to show the impacts that
can be achieved when BEC measures are integrated into ongoing rural
development activities. The idea is to start with a limited
geographical region where measurable impacts can be made within a
short space of time. In the even of a successful demonstration
project, replication to other regions of the country is envisaged.
In Zimbabwe, preparations for implementing the BEC demonstration
project in Hurungwe district are at an advanced stage. This article
describes the logical steps, and a few experiences gained with the
integrated approach in Zimbabwe.
[top]
[end]Starting a ProBEC demonstration project
The following steps have been followed and completed:
- identification of a project partner and a suitable BEC
demonstration project site,
- introduction of ProBEC to the full rural district council
meeting of Hurungwe,
- selection of needy villages to participate in the BEC
project,
- identification of other sector organisations with linkages to
BEC,
- holding village meetings to introduce ProBEC and discuss the
biomass energy problems in the villages,
- district level planning workshop for the BEC demonstration
project.
[top]
[end]Measures taken to ensure the
integrated/participatory approach
[top]
[end]Identification of a lead agency
No attempt was made to create a new structure to take charge of the
implementation of the demonstration project. The identification of
a project partner from existing organisations was done using the
criteria of:
- compatibility of organisational objectives (between ProBEC and
the partner),
- rural orientation of the partner,
- the relevance of BEC measures in the area where the prospective
partner is operating,
- outreach capacity of the partner, and
- track record in terms of interaction with the community.
The prospective partner had to demonstrate a readiness to cooperate
with other organisations in the neighbourhood, and a willingness to
contribute, one way or the other, some inputs to the project. This
partner would take the lead and coordinate the planning,
implementation and monitoring of the demonstration project.
Figure 1: Participative workshops in
Hurungwe (Probec-GTZ: Zimbabwe)
|
Out of four short-listed prospective partners, the Social Forestry
Project (SFP) in Hurungwe District was selected because it scored
very well on most of the criteria. The majority of villages in
Hurungwe are severely deforested, and some households cook with
crop residues and animal dung. The SFP has managed to cultivate a
healthy working relationship with the extension agencies in the
district, who, in turn, have adopted the SFP agenda.
[top]
[end]Community participation
A participatory rural appraisal was done for the social forestry
programme in the district, and the results were used to identify
the villages that had the greatest need for BEC interventions. This
method of selection was readily endorsed by the full council
meeting of the district as it was seen to be fair.
Figure 2: Participative workshops in
Hurungwe (Probec-GTZ: Zimbabwe)
|
To ensure full participation of the villagers right from the start,
information meetings were held with each village to share
information on their energy problems, and reflect on possible
solutions in the context of a BEC project. Both the traditional and
elected leadership gave their unreserved support. The meetings
provided the forum for the election of village representatives who
then participated in a subsequent planning meeting for the BEC demo
project at district level.
Each village sent three representatives, such as leaders of women's
groups. Others were elected because of their ability to mix easily
and work with other members of the village, eg the village
community workers (VCWs). One participant represented
informal-sector artisans. The rest of the participants came from
the extension services.
[top]
[end]Working with existing village structures
The social forestry project has been operating in Hurungwe District
for about a year now. It has set up village committees, which are
charged with coordinating the social forestry activities in the
village. The village committee is made up of elected
representatives of the villagers, plus village-based extension
workers, village community workers from the Ministry of National
Affairs, and staff members of Agritex (Agricultural extension
workers from the Ministry of Lands and Agriculture). These same
committees have now taken on the responsibility to coordinate
ProBEC activities as well.
There are a number of advantages of using existing structures.
- The coordination of development activities in the village
becomes easier because they are all channeled through the same
route. Potential conflicts between different groupings are
minimised.
- Using the same committee to coordinate different projects going
on in their village is very time-effective.
- An existing committee is already experienced, so it is not
necessary to build their capacity from scratch.
[top]
[end]Integration of the BEC project into other
sectors
The issue of biomass energy cuts across, and is linked to, many
other sectors in rural development. Nevertheless, there is still
little evidence at district level of an integrated approach to
development. For example, departments of line ministries continue
to do things separately.
An analysis of the organisations and projects which are active in
the project area showed that the sectors of health, agriculture,
natural resources, traditional authorities, education and national
affairs have links with BEC.
At the village meetings, which were held to discuss the biomass
energy problem, representatives from all the sectors above were
invited to participate. The majority did. They also participated
actively at the planning workshop of the BEC project at district
level. It was at this planning workshop that specific tasks were
allocated to the different organisations.
The commitment of the participating organisations holds the key to
the success of the integrated approach being advocated by ProBEC.
Responding to communication (letters, phone calls, requests, etc)
in good time, attending meetings, providing specific inputs,
performing agreed tasks are all indicators of commitment by a given
individual or organisation.
In Hurungwe, staff members from these organisations have offered
maximum cooperation. Recently they participated in a baseline
survey to determine the household energy situation in the villages.
Some of them have started, on their own initiative, to discuss
developing interventions (such as energy-saving stoves) with women
in their villages. One NGO, which is involved in environmental
education for schools, has undertaken to include BEC-related
messages in its future publications.
| Integration measure | Potential pitfalls |
| Selection of cooperating partner | Be sure that chosen partner is well-respected by the
community |
| Community participation | Ensure that the voices of the ordinary villagers are not
stifled by strong local leaders |
| Working with existing village structures | Some members of the village committees may become too
powerful' |
| Co-operation with other sectors | The extension workers can become overloaded |
[top]
[end]Capacity-building of field staff
Despite all the good intentions, actual implementation may be
hampered by lack of capacity of the respective field workers
outside their particular sector. Generally there is emphasis on
subject matter that is specific to the sector, but pays little
regard to linkages with other sectors. Thus an environmental health
technician or agricultural extension worker may not be aware of the
linkages between BEC and his/her own job description.
There is a need, therefore, to raise awareness and improve the
capacity of extension workers to undertake BEC activities: this can
be done through village information meetings, BEC planning
meetings, baseline surveys, and training workshops.
In implementing these measures, one needs to be aware of some
potential pitfalls to avoid as summarised in Table 1.
[top]
[end]Ways of enhancing cooperation/integration
Integration calls for deliberate effort, on a mutual basis, to
bring the different sectors to work together. The suggestions below
are largely meant for the project staff and the extension workers
at both the personal and organisational levels.
Put simply, the integrated approach is a call for the creation of
windows of cooperation on the walls that traditionally demarcate
one sector from the next. This calls for the relaxation of some of
the regulations that govern the operations of the cooperating
organisations.
[top]
[end]Understanding the social, economic and professional
situation of the partner
To the average development worker, the term 'cooperation' means
signed agreements between two organizations which have agreed to
work together to achieve some development objectives. Though
useful, the scope of such agreements in helping to meet the demands
of day-to-day project implementation work is limited. Co-operation
must be redefined in terms of the daily interaction with other
players on the rural development scene. Cooperation is then seen to
revolve around cultivating trust and mutual respect between the
project staff and the extension workers, or field workers of
NGOs.
The extension worker may be existing in a harsh economic
environment and may have adopted coping strategies to earn extra
income; for example, a teacher will offer to teach extra lessons at
night school; an agricultural extension worker may decide to rear
chickens. These extra activities may make the extension worker
reluctant to take on 'extra' responsibilities, in addition to
his/her job description.
At the professional level, job-related earnings for professional
staff have become a common feature for improving efficiency.
Extension workers have key areas of work, and their salaries may be
paid on the results achieved in these areas. Efforts should be made
to highlight areas where the job description of a field worker,
intersects with that of a multi-sectoral project such as the BEC
demonstration project. Such areas are more likely to gain ready
acceptance and cooperation from that staff member.
Two examples of overlap can be cited in Hurungwe. One is the link
between the kitchen environment and the home-based care of
terminally sick family members, eg those suffering from HIV/Aids.
Health personnel recognise the need for a clean home environment,
and thus improved stove technologies that minimise smoke in the
kitchen have aroused the interest of the environmental health
technicians (EHTs) because these stoves reduce the environmental
health problem.
The agricultural extension (Agritex) workers also see an overlap
between promoting better land use planning and setting aside a part
of the land to allow trees to grow. Harvesting of tree products for
various purposes, including fuelwood is allowed on a controlled
basis. Since BEC encourages efficient use of fuelwood, it should
have a positive impact on fuelwood supply, and consequently on land
use planning.
The integrated approach is in its early stages. At the level of
sectoral organisations, commitment has been demonstrated by
allowing their extension workers to provide time inputs to the BEC
project. In some instances, the linkages between a given sector and
BEC still need to be further defined. On the whole however, one
sees good prospects for the success of the integrated
approach.
[top]
[end]Contents: Boiling Point 44: Linking household
energy with other development objectives
.
|
Integrating household energy into wider
development objectives -
Interlinkages of household energy with the
environment -
Are energy projects not wanted any more -
Health and household energy - the need for
better links between research and development -
Cooking smoke can increase the risk of
tuberculosis -
Monitoring ECO-house performance as if people
mattered -
Carbon trading - a new route to funding
improved stove programmes -
The integrated approach to link household
energy with other development objectives -
The ecological cost of increasing dependence on
biomass fuels as household energy in rural Nigeria -
Women in post-harvest operations - reducing the
drudgery -
Light - from wind - a journey of will and
imagination -
The Tehesh efficient biomass stove, Tigrai,
Ethiopia -
The Turbo wood-gas stove
edit this page