Main knowledge bank page |
Recent additions |
Recent changes |
What links here |
Categories |
Search the forum
How-to guides |
Organisation profiles |
Project profiles
Photovoltaics for Senegal
In Senegal, domestic lighting for most villagers is provided by
kerosene lamps, dry-cell battery powered torches, and candles. Dry
cell batteries are the most common power source for radios. Only
150 villages out of a total of 13000 have access to the national
electricity grid, and of these villages only a few houses
(typically between 5 and 15%) have grid connections. There is
little hope of the grid network reaching more people in future
years, because the cost of extensions is so high. There is,
therefore, a lively interest in alternative sources of
electricity.
Practical research into these alternatives has been undertaken by
the Senegalese Government and GTZ. From 1989 to 1993, the project
set out to compare four approaches to rural electricity supply:
- National grid connection to individual houses.
- Village grid powered by a diesel generator.
- Village grid powered by a central, solar photovoltaic power
station.
- Individual, solar photovoltaic panels for individual houses
known as 'Solar Home Systems' (SHS).
Each approach provides a different quality and quantity of
electricity to the consumer. The national grid connection allows
the use of 240V light bulbs, and standard appliances, for example
televisions, found in urban homes.
The central village diesel generator and the village solar power
station are designed to give each household sufficient electricity
for several standard light bulbs and TV and radio connections. The
research team built two central solar-power stations, each of which
supplies 240V A.C. to 200 families. These stations are rated at 20
peak kilowatts (kWp); ie., the panels produce 20kW when the sun is
shining on them at peak strength.
Each solar home system (SHS) provides enough electricity for four,
10-watt, fluorescent lamps at 12V D.C., for about three or four
hours each night in each house (about half as much as the central
solar plants can provide). All electrical appliances used (for
instance radios, small TVs or fluorescent lamps) must be designed
for 12V D.C. power. A consumer wanting more power than this can
purchase two SHS units, so receiving twice the power at twice the
cost.
The research team considers the SHS system to be the most suitable
alternative for Senegalese village households. Despite smaller kWhr
capacity, it provides better light than the traditional kerosene
lamp or candles, together with increased comfort, convenience and
safety. 95% of the population are unlikely to require more than
this amount of electricity, and the 5% who do require more can
purchase a double system.
Unlike the traditional sources of energy, the SHS system still
poses problems. The traditional energy sources do not require large
capital investments: small quantities of kerosene, dry cells, or
candles can be bought as and when the family has the necessary cash
available. Most villages (around 80% of the rural population) spend
between US$30 and $120 each year on equipment and fuel for lighting
and radios, whereas the SHS system requires a down-payment or
capital investment of $737. The wet batteries, which are charged by
the photo-voltaic panels, cost around $60 duty free and need
replacing every three years. A further $10-15 a year is required to
maintain the system. If the capital investment is converted into an
annual cost, the overall annual costs amount to $130 (duty free) or
$200 (duty paid). Only the wealthiest 20% of the rural Senegalese
population now spend this much on batteries, kerosene, or bottled
gas, and could afford the SHS sys tem. The improvements in comfort
offered by the SHS system, however, suggest that as much as 50% of
the rural population would be prepared to spend more on lighting
and communications - assuming tax-free availability, as recommended
in the report.
Four alternative electrical systems
|
Although 20 to 50% of the population is likely to find
reduced-price SHS systems attractive, there are major reservations
about actual market demand. If the widespread diffusion of the SHS
system is undertaken by private enterprises, which introduce
retailer's markups, each system will cost about $1000 or more to
buy. A market study showed that only 5% of the population would pay
cash if the system sold for about $670. A credit scheme would be
essential, but even then only 15 to 20% of the population could
afford the systems.
Nevertheless, the decentralized photovoltaic system is recommended
as the best option for rural electrification, and the report
recommends government support for the following:
- Exemption from taxes and duties;
- Quality control over locally manufactured equipment;
- Training of local technicians and promotion of local
organizations for installation and maintenance;
- Involvement of private businesses.
Electricity supplied by the national grid is estimated to cost
$4.20 for each kWhr consumed, while the central solar station would
deliver electricity at $3.50 per kWhr, and the diesel generator at
$2.40/kWhr, whereas the SHS systems could deliver at $2.50/kWhr.
This costing study was carried out for the village of Diaoulé where
the 200 houses connected are positioned relatively close together.
In most other villages the houses are more scattered, which would
raise the cost of electricity distribution and so make a central
diesel generator more expensive and SHS systems more
attractive.
- Village power plants versus solar home systems - rural
electrification by photovoltaic systems in the Senegal, by Benno
Schmidt-Kuntzl and Geog Schafer, Senegalese/German Solar Energy
Project, GATE Journal 3/93.
[top]
[end]Contents:
Boiling Point 33: Household Energy Developments in Asia
.
|
Asian stove programmes as seen by ARECOP -
Stove work in Nepal-
Nepals Community Forestry Development
Programme -
The Anagi - successful Sri Lankan stove -
Next steps for Sri Lanka stove programmes -
Cookstove programme in Indonesia -
Keralas Parishad chulha programme -
Magan Chulha - Kallupatti - Sukad -
The Philippines Improved Stove Programme
1995-2000 -
The Vientiane energy switch -
Asian Regional Wood Energy Development
Programme -
What makes people cook with improved stoves
-
A steel and concrete stove for Nicaragua -
Zimbabwes Sloven woodstove -
Better biomass residue fuel cakes -
Photovoltaics for Senegal -
Ethanol stoves for Mauritius -
Will people change their diets to save fuel
-
The better bonfire
edit this page