Main knowledge bank page |
Recent additions |
Recent changes |
What links here |
Categories |
Search the forum
How-to guides |
Organisation profiles |
Project profiles
Monitoring ECO-house performance as if people mattered
Observation des performances d'une maison
écologique
Des maisons utilisant une conception solaire passive ont été
construites afin d'améliorer la performance environnementale des
habitations situées dans les banlieues Kutlwanong, en Afrique du
Sud. Le projet a réussi à lier développement économique durable
avec les priorités de la communauté que sont un habitat décent et
l'emploi. |
[top]
[end]Background of Project
PEER Africa (Pty) started the ECO-housing program in 1995 as a
solution to several prevailing environmental and social problems
occurring in the South Africa low-cost (mass) housing market
sector. The company started the project in a township area called
the Community of Kutlwanong.
PEER Africa's 'environmental and energy concerns' are based on the
general condition of the environment in South Africa (and other
developing countries), which is undergoing major change,
particularly in 'black settlement areas'. Much of this concern is
due to the need to use biomass as a source of energy by the poor
population residing in informal housing, and the homeless. The use
of these fuels has resulted in deforestation, hazardous indoor air
quality due to high pollutant levels, and major respiratory disease
problems among women and children.
The PEER Africa ECO-Homes were designed using a passive solar
design computer package called Energy 10, which was specifically
developed for small and medium-sized buildings. Passive solar
design uses simple techniques that improve a building's energy
performance and its environmental sustainability through day
lighting, passive solar heating, proper orientation to the sun,
thermal mass, heating and cooling by natural ventilation, and
proper shading. Passive solar design integrates a building's
elements - walls, windows, materials, lighting, mechanical systems,
etc. - in ways that improve the overall energy and environmental
performance year around.
There are a number of excellent studies of fuel and energy use in
South African black communities done by Universities and research
consultants. The works provided excellent background and relevant
information for the work being done by PEER Africa.
Figure 1: Units designed by PEER Africa
(PTY) Ltd. on Nubengula Street Kutlwanong Township, Kimberley
(South African National Department of Housing)
|
The South African project also aimed at evaluating wealth creation
for poor families by helping to produce practical examples of
self-build methods, which lower the cost of construction without
lowering the value of the structure. In addition, the passive solar
design features, coupled with home owner awareness training, can
reduce the monthly operating costs of the household, and free up
time and effort normally spent collecting firewood, because less
fuel is consumed.
This statement supports many of the findings of from the work of
Dr. Flora Mosaka-Wright formally of the Development Bank of South
Africa. Dr. Wright studied the role and issues facing rural women
and the hardships associated with gathering firewood for household
energy use.
PEER Africa was successful in integrating a sustainable economic
development vision with priorities of the community and with energy
and environmentally friendly ideals. Phase one of the project took
nearly a year of meetings with the community and other development
stakeholders in the area. The development priorities of the
community were simply stated as, 'decent housing and jobs'.
Figure 2: Unemployed residents at start of
hands-on training on Nubengula Street (Douglas Guy)
|
The community already had roads and serviced stands installed by
the local municipality when PEER Africa arrived and started the
project in 1995; unfortunately most of the layout and design was
completed without input from the proposed beneficiaries.
At the request of the beneficiaries and in conjunction with the
Kutlwanong Civic Integrated Housing Trust (KCIHT) an integrated
housing proposal was designed by PEER Africa to create the best
possible 'housing and job creation' environment. The Provincial
Housing Board (PHB) is the established government body, which
manages all national housing subsidies and projects at the state or
provincial level in the country.
There are nine PHBs in South Africa, one for each state or
province. The PHB approved the construction of 200 demonstration
ECO-Housing units designed by PEER Africa, to be constructed by the
community using the Self-Help Peoples Housing Process
approach.
The Peoples Housing Process is a formal national housing programme
alternative to contractor based housing. In this case, the
Government encourages women and local community groups to form an
association and to facilitate the construction of their own homes.
Lefa Mallane, the formal national coordinator of the South African
Peoples Housing Process policy, drove these concepts.
| While a part of this project is to try to estimate probable
greenhouse gas reductions, that is really not the main thrust of
this work. |
[top]
[end]Global Climate Change (GCC)
The ECO-Housing project was not started with the goal of addressing
the current global climate change issues. Discussions with
community leaders failed to find a direct benefit to global
greenhouse gas reduction in view of more pressing survival needs
(e.g. housing and jobs). PEER Africa worked with community leaders
to develop a meaningful linkage between these needs and the
importance of greenhouse gas reduction. The result was to focus on
the indoor air quality health related issues and the high cost of
space heating.
A short field study in Kutlwanong, which detected carbon monoxide
in many of the informal dwellings, helped to make the issue of
greenhouse gas/air pollution more personal to the local people.
This 'local linkage' served as a catalyst for future discussions
and programmes to help reduce the causes of pollution in poor
households. PEER Africa and KCIHT adopted the concept that a decent
home must also be a healthy home, and indoor air quality became a
key component or requirement in the ECO-home project.
This concept was in contrast to the national housing policy at the
time, which was understandably focused on restructuring the housing
administration to address the need to deliver basic shelters to
hundreds of thousands of homeless families.
In December 1999, the Government announced a number of
environmentally friendly housing standards that were to be
'considered' by contractors and developers of lower cost units.
Prior to this, there was really no major enforcement of quality
standards for houses constructed in poor communities.
Fortunately, the current housing National Housing Minister
recognizes the importance of housing standards and has been the key
to improvements and innovations in housing policy.
Although global climate-change-related research started as a
secondary mission to this project, it creates the need to develop a
monitoring and certification process for standards and guidelines.
Importantly, this process must become an integral component of the
Sustainable Economic Development (SED) plan of the local community.
There were no funds available from the government-housing subsidy
for either energy-efficient and environmentally-friendly housing
design research or to address greenhouse gas monitoring. As a
result, PEER Africa and the KCIHT wrote several proposals to
international groups, some of which were in conjunction with the
International Institute for Energy Consumption (IIEC) South
Africa.
The project was initially funded by Dr. Abron and Douglas Guy, and
later received a grant from the US Department of Energy and was
supported by USAID South Africa for the past two years. IIEC South
Africa also provided funding for capacity building via several
healthy home initiatives in the local community, which used the
Kutlwanong model as the basis of a broader scale awareness and
support programme.
The funding obtained from donors creates the opportunity to develop
technical and socio-economic data which can be used to compare the
performance of the ECO-House building-family unit and behaviour of
the non-ECO-House family units. The results of this comparison
(reduction in operating costs and greenhouse gas reduction) can be
a catalyst to changing local and provincial government policy
relating to community development and design requirements. The
benefit to the local community of Kutlwanong is the development of
a research and testing environment that can provide jobs for local
residents (e.g. surveying, tending to monitoring equipment
etc.).
| One objective of the project was to design and build a home
that met local resident requirements, and that would remain
comfortable through the year with little or no external heating
sources in the winter, and cooling sources required in the
summer. |
[top]
[end]The PEER Africa Low-cost Housing Monitoring
Programme
It is very important to explain the purpose of the monitoring
programme in terms that are relevant to the local community and
development stakeholders from the local region.
The research is important because there is a lack of quality field
information that compares energy use and related family behaviour
in shanties (informal structures), new government housing for the
poor, and the proposed PEER Africa ECO-Housing option. Monitoring
in poor communities must be performed to validate claims of cost
saving and improvements in air quality.
The method of evaluation is the critical point here. Housing is a
very personal experience for most poor people and research must be
carried out sensitively. Performance monitoring requires the
researcher to observe the family and unquestionably has an effect
on the behaviour of the householders. The researcher must figure
out a way to integrate the research with the real needs of the
family and the community. In fact, the community must be part of
the programme from design to post-project maintenance and
reporting.
The community respondents were appreciative that staff members
visited their homes to find out how the new homes were performing
and to obtain their feedback.
Preliminary results suggest that the respondents wanted the
opportunity to express their comments about community development
in general as well as about their own particular houses. Some
expressed their desire for other communities to learn from their
successes and mistakes. Greenhouse gas mitigation was not really
one of the reasons for their input or concern.
The purpose of the PEER Africa monitoring programme is to determine
if the passive solar designed homes performed as per expectations
and as the computer software-modelling tool predicted with respect
to annual, daily indoor temperatures, pollutants, humidity, and
airflow profiles. Associated outdoor physical data needs to be
collected as well, i.e., daily temperature, humidity (perhaps), and
solar insulation profiles, precipitation, cloud cover, air quality
index, etc.
Figure 3: Insulation being installed by a
trained worker to reduce energy needs (South African National
Department of Housing)
|
There were a number of very important design features that came
from the residents themselves. During the design process a number
of options were considered, including the amount of insulation in
the walls and ceilings, the thickness of the building envelope, and
the mass inside the houses.
While the homes were built on the principle of passive solar
design, the actual construction did not completely adhere to the
design specifications that would provide the greatest possible
thermal performance. This was primarily because of the all
important aspect of homeowner preference, and also because of the
poorly designed street and site layout inherited from local
municipality city planners. For example, some homeowners did not
want their large windows to face the toilets at the back of the
site. Also, the orientation of the site with the street prevented
the homes, in some cases, from having the proper orientation with
respect to the sunlight.
A major thrust of the current work is to understand how the
house-family unit performs in reality (with real families living
inside), and to compare that data with model predictions.
Based on this analysis, it is hoped that a method will be developed
that will determine the strengths and limitations of the computer
modelling tool. This will enable other developers to continue to
design these affordable Eco-Homes with less costs being passed on
to the beneficiary. An added benefit is that researchers may be
able to determine the potential greenhouse gas reductions that
could be achieved if this type of construction is used
extensively.
The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions to this paper
from Willie Johnson site engineer Thami Eland, Zombo Jansen, Mittah
Kolberg, Maggie Bendow, Ivon Babasang, and Vincent Diraditsila from
KCIHT. Premier Manie Dipico, Provincial Housing Minister Pakes
Digetsi and the Kimberley City Council.
[top]
[end]Contents: Boiling Point 44: Linking household
energy with other development objectives
.
|
Integrating household energy into wider
development objectives -
Interlinkages of household energy with the
environment -
Are energy projects not wanted any more -
Health and household energy - the need for
better links between research and development -
Cooking smoke can increase the risk of
tuberculosis -
Monitoring ECO-house performance as if people
mattered -
Carbon trading - a new route to funding
improved stove programmes -
The integrated approach to link household
energy with other development objectives -
The ecological cost of increasing dependence on
biomass fuels as household energy in rural Nigeria -
Women in post-harvest operations - reducing the
drudgery -
Light - from wind - a journey of will and
imagination -
The Tehesh efficient biomass stove, Tigrai,
Ethiopia -
The Turbo wood-gas stove
edit this page