Main knowledge bank page |
Recent additions |
Recent changes |
What links here |
Categories |
Search the forum
How-to guides |
Organisation profiles |
Project profiles
Towards a policy agenda for Indoor Air Pollution best practice
This discussion is aimed at developing recommendations for policy
and practice on ways in which levels of indoor air pollution (IAP)
can be alleviated. Ideally, these recommendations should be reached
by consensus of key actors and organisations working in the field
of smoke and health within each country and we would invite you
take part. This net-based discussion is based on working groups
being set up by
ITDG within its
smoke alleviation work in Kenya, Nepal and Sudan. However, the aim
of this
HEDON discussion is to
provide data from all countries which can be freely accessed by all
and 'owned' by all. The information will be collated by
country.
- To collate information on previous experience and identify
factors which have led to success and to failure in the past.
- Based on this knowledge, to develop policy recommendations for
alleviating smoke
- To provide indicators on the cost of introducing these policy
measures, and of the expected levels of poverty reduction based on
the introduction of those measures. (Poverty reduction based on
Sustainable Livelihoods definition)
- To produce a discussion paper on further actions, at community
level, which are needed to fill the knowledge gaps on IAP.
It is very evident that successful sustainable solutions come from
integrated action. Please therefore take part if you belong to:
- Communities who have knowledge on smoke alleviation
- Government (local and/or national - health, environment,
shelter, energy, small enterprise, planning commissions)
- NGOs involved in energy, health, environment, small enterprise,
credit
- Finance organisations - micro-credit, revolving fund organisers
(such as informal women's groups), development banks
- Businesses - both SMEs and suppliers of gas stoves etc.
- Country representatives from international organisations, such
as WHO, international donors, World Bank
- Education specialists - curriculum advisers, child-to-child
practioners
- Interested individuals with knowledge of smoke alleviation
Two to three years
[top]
[end]Framework
for discussion and action
In the paper
Review of interventions to reduce the exposure of women and young
children to indoor air pollution in developing countries (941
KB) produced by
Grant Ballard-Tremeer and Angela Matthee for the
WHO/USAID consultation on Indoor Air Pollution and Health on 3/4
May 2000 in Washington DC, the authors identified three key areas
in which interventions can lead to reduced levels of IAP:
- the source (emissions)
- the local environment (concentrations)
- the user (exposure)
Twenty-three possible interventions were assessed according to
eight criteria which could either the benefit of the intervention
or the restrictions preventing greater use. These criteria are:
- Exposure level
- Cost
- Local environmental impact
- Regional and global environmental impacts
- Safety concerns
- Impact on local employment
- Acceptance and suitability
- Market readiness.
However, the paper also indicated that 'it was evident from the
analysis that further attention should be given to the collection
and compiling of data so that informed decisions may be made'. I
would suggest that this discussion should adopt the three key areas
(source, environment, user), look at the eight criteria, but
concentrate on more pragmatic considerations based on field
knowledge to assess success:
Please could I therefore ask you to fill in the attached
questionnaire as completely as possible ? add as much detail as you
wish. Please let us know your views even if you do not complete the
form - all information is valuable. If you feel we've missed
anything, please let us know
In this document, the word 'intervention' means any technology, or
social or economic activity, that has led to a reduced level of
indoor air pollution in the home. Please give references wherever
possible for the data. Please use separate pages in the forum for
each intervention. Some guidance notes of how to do this are
provided
below.
- Nature of intervention (improved stove, education package,
forest planting etc.)
- Was the intervention successful? -how many households
benefited?
- If 'yes' what were the key aspects which led to this
success?
- If 'no' what were the key aspects which caused it to fail?
- Who were the key players and networks that devised and
implemented the intervention?
- What was the time frame of the intervention?
- Was the intervention evaluated? If yes, what kind of evaluation
was conducted, i.e. process or outcome, qualitative or
quantitative, anecdotal etc.?
- Were tests conducted to show that the intervention reduced
IAP?
- If 'yes' please describe them
- Was an evaluation conducted to show that the intervention
reduced health problems and improved quality of life? If yes, was
this is anecdotal evidence, qualitative evaluation, or quantitative
evaluation
- What were the impacts, e.g. health, economic, time,
education?
- What are the geographic limits of the intervention? - how could
they be increased?
- What was the level of subsidy? - where did it come from? - how
sustainable is it?
- If some form of external loan finance was involved, what form
did it take? (micro-credit, revolving funds)
- Have any follow-up studies been done? - if 'yes' what were the
findings
- Was the intervention sustainable in the long-term; is it
ongoing? Are there future plans?
- If not, what caused the intervention to fail? - what could be
changed?
- Based on the negative findings, what policy and practice
changes would be needed to overcome the problems?
- What best practices can be identified from successes?
- Who could best implement policy changes required to make a
positive impact
[top]
[end]List
of completed questionnaires
- None completed as yet, please list your completed
questionnaires here
To make your contribution, either download the questionnaire, fill
it in, and email it to
Liz Bates (see her personal page for email) or
follow the steps below:
Download the questionnaire (31 KB)
- Fill in your responses
- Edit this forum page and add a new page (read How you can get involved, make a new page, and make good pagenames for some guidance on how to
do this). Give your new page a 'project profile' category.
- Paste your response into the new page you have just
created.
- Create new pages for each project you describe.
[top]
[end]External
links and references
User:Liz Bates 20 November 2003
edit this page