Main knowledge bank page |
Recent additions |
Recent changes |
What links here |
Categories |
Search the forum
How-to guides |
Organisation profiles |
Project profiles
Energy options for Refugee Camps
By June 1995, the East Africa region had hosted some four million
refugees which was more than half of the continents share of seven
and a half million. The figure is alarmingly high from the energy
requirements point of view. It is estimated that the daily fuelwood
requirement per person in the refugee camps is 1.7 kilograms. Based
on the June 1995 figures, 6.8 million kilograms of firewood are
consumed by the East African refugee community daily. Energy
requirements are an important part of the refugee situation and
severe shortages can have serious social and environmental
results.
ITDG's Household Energy Regional (HER) Project work includes
gathering and sharing information, training, promoting appropriate
household energy technologies (giving options) and supporting
agencies canying out household energy work in East Africa. The
project aims to increase the capacity and commitment of community
development agencies in the region to implement effective
activities. The experience gained and shared with the East African
community over the last four years has enabled the project to help
in the drawing up of plans to reduce the risk of energy disasters
affecting nutrition and health, and the environment. Heavy
collection of biomass fuel by refugees destroys the vegetation in
the area surrounding the camps. Work with refugees is usually
designed to save lives and prevent disasters caused by the
concentration of large numbers of people in camps. Energy is not
immediately identified as urgent as food, water, health or warmth,
although it is essential for cooking.
The questions to be answered are which forms of energy? How will
they be obtained? How will the use of biomass energy affect the
environment and communities living around the camps (host country)?
The answers to these question will depend on the local situation in
each case.
When the refugees first arrive firewood is usually available and
sometimes abundant and so the control of procurement and use are
very relaxed. The main problem may be transport and distribution.
Check thickness of walls and position of
pot in stove
|
The next stage will be shortages of firewood in nearby areas so
that the refugees have to walk long distance in search of fuel and
carry heavier loads. Anticipating and planning for this situation
is very important but experience has shown that many refugee
workers do not recognize this, perhaps because it often builds up
gradually over several months.
In the crisis stage there will be a severe shortage of firewood or
even a complete absence. Children are the first victims because
they have to walk long distances in the hot sun. Old people suffer
as well as the children because they both have more need for warm
meals. Although other aspects of nutrition and health are
important, cooking energy supply is a priority during the crisis
stage.
[top]
[end]Woodfuel
Consumption
Measured daily consumption of firewood varies from one camp to
another, ranging from 0.8kg per head in Bangladesh to about 3.0kg
per head in the Benaco camp in Tanzania, with an average of about
1.7kg per head. Refugee camps have been known to consume up to one
million kilograms of firewood in a week, all obtained from the same
area.
Urgent and effective interventions are needed, not only to ensure
fuel supplies but also to lay the foundations for rehabilitation of
the degraded areas. Several alternative measures are available. The
guiding principles are to give communities alternative technologies
that are culturally acceptable or similar to what they are used to.
The more replicable low cost, locally available, easy to make and
culturally fitting is the technology, the higher its chance of
success.
The best alternative, where the refugees have been using three
stone fires, is to introduce mud stoves or shielded fires. This is
effective when coupled with the promotion of fuel saving practices
such as the use of lids, pre-soaking cereals and beans before
cooking and only lighting the fire when needed and putting it out
immediately it is not needed. Other fuels and cookers could be
tried but should be introduced - with care, preferably giving
several alternatives. These end use interventions can be
supplemented by planting quick growing trees, some of which produce
firewood after three to five years. Emergency assistance should be
provided in ways which will support recovery and long term
development.
[top]
[end]The
East Africa refugee situation - case study
In June 1995 ITDG HER staff visited the Kyambslise I and 11 refugee
camps in the Karagwe region of Tanzania.
Wet outside of pot and use to form inside
of stove
|
It was established during the visit that the goal of the UNHCR was
to reduce the daily fuelwood consumption per head to Ikg in the two
camps. The HER project considered this would require a combination
of approaches based on the supply of faster cooking food, more
efficient cooking systems and economy measures by the refugees and
deliberate withdrawal of access to wood resources.
[top]
[end]Production
and promotion of improved mudstoves
The following recommendations were made:
- It was more important to raise awareness of the overall idea of
energy conservation among refugees than to promote any particular
design of stove. Local variations and innovative ideas need to be
encouraged as any mudstove will conserve 30 to 40% of fuel compared
with an open fire.
- Most of the stoves observed already had the important basic
components of protection from draft, adequate air supply and rests
for different sizes of pots. However, the following improvements
were recommended:
- The Togo design which was being introduced at the time of the
visit was recommended for people used to using three stones
(although the door arch reduces its efficiency)
- Small holes in some of the stove seen needed to be removed (a
gradual shift to holeless stoves could be tried to start with) as
they serve only to allow heat to escape; likewise external chimneys
could be avoided
- The critical distance between the bottom of the pot and the
fire, two fist heights (normally 4 inches) needs to be ensured
- The walls of the stove should not be more than one fist (3
inches) or the stove will take too long to heat up
- The stove should be built to face the prevailing wind - a gap
of about half an inch should be maintained between the outside of
the pot and the inside of the stove wall to allow the smoke to
escape when the stove has no chimney. Alternatively vertical smoke
channels can be made if the pot is sunken or by adding three small
pot rests on the top.
As there was plenty of soil material suitable for making mud stoves
more complicated stove technolo gies were not considered to be
justified.
Camp community stoves It was considered that large, efficient
stoves could reduce firewood consumption by at least 50 per cent.
High quality steel stoves were available from several producers in
East Africa in 50,100 and 200 litre sizes but their cost was
expected to range from US$5-10 per litre capacity.
[top]
[end]Other
possible fuelsaving technologies
Tests could be carried out with 'fireless cookers' or heat storage
cookers, such as hay boxes using maize and beans coupled with food
saving practices such as the use of lids.
A solar cooker promoter based in Nairobi offered to introduce them
to the camp and so extensive testing was recommended to improve
technology and social acceptability using the whole range of WFP
rations. A degree of healthy scepticism was advised based on the
characteristics of the camp, weather conditions and social
requirements of the Rwandan refugee community.
It was not felt that the use of biogas, coal, photo-voltaic energy,
or briquetted fuels would be cost effective and that efforts should
be concentrated on proven methods such as energy saving biomass
stoves and cooking practices and reafforestation, although the
introduction of other energy options could be done on a pilot
basis.
[top]
[end]Community
involvement
More widespread adoption of fuel saving practices could be achieved
through discussions with key women respected by the community who
could pass ideas and information back. Questions of firewood
conservation and financial constraints could also be discussed.
Such meetings could provide a forum for discussion and choice of
practices to be promoted. Most of these would be already familiar
to the women who may have good reasons for not putting them into
practice. Meetings should be held away from the main camp area to
avoid intrusion by men and children and should produce visual
material for distribution in the camp.
Experience has widely shown that if firewood is in short supply
refugees will, in time, respond by reducing their consumption
through the use of improved stoves and economy practices in
cooking. This should be encouraged by distributing any available
firewood some distance from the camp. Any camps situated near
forests will quickly destroy them. Although this was desirable, it
was found unrealistic to try to contain refugees and the
distribution of fuelwood in controlled quantities but it may be
possible to police high consuming activities such as brick burning
and charcoal making with the co-operation of the local authorities.
As 1,500 tonnes of Tanzanian firewood per day were being consumed
by the refugees in Kagera it was imperative to start a
reafforestation programme immediately. It was decided to encourage
local Tanzanian enterprises to germinate seeds, raise seedlings and
carry out planting using seeds, tubes and with financial incentives
provided by donors/NGOs. Planting should be at least 10-15km from
the camps to maintain an imposed fuel shortage. Tree planting will
provide the foundation for rehabilitation work but will not relieve
the firewood crisis.
[top]
[end]Early
planning for energy
Ways of dealing with refugee camp domestic energy needs and their
effects on the refugees and existing local communities and
environment need to be planned from the time the site is
chosen.
Camp authorities and community leaders should investigate all
possible sources of fuels, particularly biomass. Briquettes, biogas
and solar were viewed with some scepticism.
All forms of energy conservation, old and new, should be encouraged
by training and example eg lids, simmering, extinguishing fires,
preheating vegetables, wood drying, use of heat storage cookers.
Community involvement is essential.
Where the refugees are accustomed to using a three-stone fires the
project should propose
improvements such as the construction of mud stoves or shielded
fires designed to suit the fuels available and the appropriate
types of cooking. Advice from stove specialists should be obtained.
Large stoves for centralized cooking are much more fuel efficient
than family stoves where they are socially acceptable. If not,
cooking for groups of families should be considered.
Work should be started as a camp activity as soon as possible and
can be productive of firewood in three or four years.
The study showed that despite the complexity of refugee situations.
camps share several problems and can learn from experiences
elsewhere. One message was very clear - energy and environment
considerations should be included.
[top]
[end]Contents:
Boiling Point 37: Household energy in emergency situations
.
|
Energy options for Refugee Camps -
ApTibeT Refugee Projects in Ladakh -
Solar Cookits for Kenya Camps -
Cooking Energy as Seen by a Planner -
Stoves in Emergency Actions -
Stoves for Centralized Cooking for Emergency
Settlements -
Camp Cooking -
Stove Checklist for Refugee Situations -
African Refugee Energy Workshop -
Sunseed solar cooker-Tanzania trials 1995 -
Vietnam Low-Cost Solar Water Heater -
Energy for domestic brewing and bread
baking -
Indian Chulha technology since 1983
edit this page