| Main knowledge bank page |
Recent additions |
Recent changes |
What links here |
Categories |
Category cloud How-to guides | Organisation profiles | Project profiles | |||||||||||||
Energy news from Practical Action BP52
[top] [end]Boiling Point now and into the futureIn 2004, Boiling Point sent out a survey to every reader. This was partly to see if the high cost of sending out print copies was -effective, and partly to see how people felt about the journal. Each edition contained a single twosided questionnaire and an envelope – so those choosing to return the form had to fill in the form and put postage on the envelope. Filling in the form was intended to take around ten minutes maximum.Of those who responded, 54 were in the North and 108 were from the South. At present these audiences receive a printed copy of the journal and the readership was asked whether they could access it electronically. A summary of the survey results is presented in Table 1:
[top] [end]ReadershipThe respondents were asked to classify their organisation by a tick-list and it was noted that a high number of respondents were either from NGOs or from academic institutions. The number of academic institutions does not mirror the general readership that is largely NGOs and CBOs – who are also well represented, as shown in Figure 1. It could be argued that the high number of academic institutions taking the trouble to answer the questionnaire is a good indicator of the interest that Boiling Point generates in universities and colleges.Of the 106 responses which provided data on the number of people reading the journal, a surprising number suggested that more than 10 readers per copy; this probably reflects the high number of academic establishments responding to the survey who wrote down the numbers of students with access to the journal.
[top] [end]CommentsPerhaps the most interesting part of the survey for an editor was the diverse comments coming from our readers. The most negative responses we received were; ‘Please discontinue my subscription’ and ‘People don’t read English’. On the positive side, there seem to be a strong feeling of ownership and desire for the journal.[top] [end]Technical & socio-economic articles:
[top] [end]On readership
[top] [end]Future plansAs those of our readers with computer access will know, the HEDON Household Energy website (www.hedon.info) provides a wealth of information on household energy. In the future, Boiling Point will not only deliver the same quality of information in the paper edition, but will have the following additional features:
HEDON is committed to reaching those without access to computers as well as those who can use the web. This is a time of transition, and as editor for the past few years I would urge everyone who enjoys Boiling Point to think about what they can do to make it even better in the coming years. If you have not written for the journal before, then why not disseminate your work to a worldwide audience. If you have used the journal in the past in one of your projects, why not write a letter to the new editor describing what has been achieved. Additional funding is always welcome as sending it out at no cost is very expensive indeed. Boiling Point has been going now since 1982, with ongoing support from both Practical Action (then ITDG) and GTZ. I would like to sign off by wishing HEDON every success, and paying tribute to the original editor Ian Grant whose vision and dedication led this journal from two pages of A4 paper stapled together in the corner into a journal very similar to today's version. [top] [end]Download the original article Energy news from Practical Action (152 KB)[top] [end]Contents: Boiling Point 52 - Health, safety and household energy
| |||||||||||||
Page created:
29 June 2007; Last edited:
22 May 2008; Version: 2 | |||||||||||||
Pagename: EnergyNewsFromPracticalActionBP52 @HEDON: FHFA | |||||||||||||





Energy news from Practical Action (152 KB)