Main knowledge bank page |
Recent additions |
Recent changes |
What links here |
Categories |
Search the forum
How-to guides |
Organisation profiles |
Project profiles
Community participation in the development of an improved stove in a cold region of North India
In rural India, the domestic sector accounts for nearly 75% of the
total energy consumed; with cooking accounting for almost 90% of
household energy use. Annually, the present level of consumption of
fuelwood is around 200 million tonnes (Sinha C. S. et. al.), whilst
it is estimated that the annual sustainable yield of fuelwood is
only about 86 million tonnes. Thus, a wide gap exists between
demand and sustainable supply. At the same time, traditional stoves
have serious effects on the environment and lead to high levels of
indoor air pollution, which affect the health of women and
children.
This paper deals with the strategies adopted in the Solan district
of Himachal Pradesh for introducing an improved mud cooking stove,
which has an embedded water tank. The altitude of Himachal Pradesh
rises from 900m, its most prominent landmark is the perennial white
snow-line on various peaks. The winters are quite severe with
temperature sometimes dropping to -400C in the cold desert zone of
Lahaul and Spiti districts. Thus, water and space heating are major
requirements, apart from cooking (Aggarwal R, Chandel S S, 1997).
The most commonly used stoves are traditional wood-burning mud
stoves with efficiencies ranging from 8% to 10%. The common fuel
species are pinus roxburghii, and Banj (Quercus), as well as a few
other less common shrubs.
The traditional cooking stove was modified to meet the need for hot
water expressed by the local community.
Initial results were obtained from a water-heating tank attached to
a stove, which had been developed by a local housewife. An inbuilt
water tank was -placed at the bottom of the firebox with
connections to the bathroom. This design was modified to develop
the TERI model of improved stove for the village. The new model was
installed in a test household and monitored for one month. The
design was modified several times after discussions with the
households. The shape and design of the kitchen, and user
preferences were considered, so that the stove design could be
modified slightly to suit individual households.
Stove characteristics Two embedded water tanks (combined
capacity 15 litres) one on each side of the fire box. These two
tanks are connected to each other, they get their cold water supply
from an overhead tank and the hot water can be drawn from a tap
provided in the kitchen or the bathroom. Heat is conducted to the
water tanks from the firebox, and hot water is available after
igniting the stove. The tanks are covered with mud on the outside
to reduce heat loss. Usually, a steam pipe is fitted to the
overhead tank to vent the system. A chimney channels the smoke
outside. A front damper maintains the temperature in the stove and
water pipes.
Figure 1: Schematic drawing of improved stove  |
[top]
[end]Community Co-operation
Important factors in this project were:
- the involvement of the test household in the project
- their willingness to cope with repeated instructions and
construction
- the co-operation of household members in providing valuable
ideas for modification
The next step was to install the stove in five sample households,
who were enthusiastic to adopt the system and were willing to pay
for it. Further performance tests were carried out during this
phase. Again, the willingness of households to adopt a test
technology was important in this demonstration and dissemination
phase.
[top]
[end]Stove performance tests
Two days were spent in making and installing the stove in each of
the five households. During this time, household members were given
detailed information on how the stove worked. A second visit was
made after 4-5 days to show households how to use the stove. Ten to
twenty days after installation, tests were carried out using
improved and traditional models to compare fuel consumption and
cooking time (tests were repeated); results showed that households
saved both fuel (Figure 2) and cooking time (Figure 3); on average,
about 45%. At the same time, users were asked what they thought
about the improved model compared to their traditional stoves.
Figure 2: Fuel consumption results for five
test households
|
Figure 3: Cooking time results (traditional
and improved cooking stoves)
|
[top]
[end]Technology Promotion
The improved stove models installed in the five households were
used to demonstrate the technology to the local communities, and to
provide data for technical performance assessment. To convince the
village community about the benefits of the technology, the Mahila
Mandal was asked to disseminate information as it was believed to
have closer contact and more credibility with the community. (The
Mahila Mandal is a social group, organized by women at village
level for various social, economic and religious activities.)
At the same time, awareness programmes for village women were
created dealing with: fuel-wood consumption; over-exploitation of
resources, deforestation, health hazards from indoor pollution, and
the benefits of improved cooking stove technology.
The test results from the performance surveys of the improved
cooking stoves were shared with communities in neighbouring
villages, who were invited to see the installed models themselves.
The objective was to promote the technology in several villages and
create a wider demand for the devices.
[top]
[end]Dissemination strategies
The dissemination strategy used in this project was successful
because of the approach it adopted. Demand for the stove was
generated by successive rounds of demonstration. After the first
test model was installed, households in the village were
approached, and a ranked list was prepared of volunteer households
who wanted to adopt the stove in the first phase. Demonstrations of
these stoves generated acceptance in surrounding households, who
were able to see the stoves working before they made their
decision.
Figure 4: Improved stove in use
|
Test results were shared with neighbouring villages, and Mahila
Mandal groups were engaged to inform villagers of the benefits.
Awareness programmes were held to promote the technology in terms
of environmental and health benefits.
[top]
[end]Assessing the demand for stoves
A demand assessment survey was conducted in several villages. The
residents of nearby villages could visit the households and inspect
the stoves for themselves and talk to the test households before
making up their minds. About 20 households adopted the technology
at this stage. When more stoves were installed, additional demand
was generated.
Figure 5: A lady drawing hot water from the
tap connected to the stove
|
[top]
[end]Flexibility in stove design
Another aspect of acceptance was the flexibility of the improved
cooking stove. Households could have extra features installed or
the system modified according to their choice if they were willing
to pay the additional cost.
In all 86 rural families from the 15 small villages benefited,
improving their kitchens by giving them efficient and user-friendly
cooking and water-heating devices. The most visible benefit was the
availability of hot water without making extra work, and there were
other gains, including fuel and time saved, and reduced smoke
emissions during the cooking. The technology was well received,
leading to demand from other households. It was noticed that
households using the improved stove benefited by having more free
time and being less tired. This has a direct impact on the time and
care they can devote to their children, and the quality of their
kitchen environment. It is also expected to provide an annual
saving of 260 tonnes of biomass in the region.
The project has now ended and the programme has been handed on to a
local NGO. Stoves are now being installed by local entrepreneurs,
who have found that the design is well-accepted and considered
desirable by the local community. Consequently, no further
modifications are planned for the stove, although increasing its
overall efficiency might be possible. It is currently priced at Rs
500-600 (Rs70 = £1UK) depending on the amount of pipe-work
required, and compares favourably with the cost of an equivalent
metal stove.
- Sinha C. S, Joshi V. 1997. Biofuel demand estimation in the
rural domestic energy sector of India Rural and renewable energy:
perspective from developing countries, Ramana P.V.(ed.), 128-140
pp. Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi.
- Aggarwal R, Chandel S S. 1997. 'Thermal performance comparison
of metal stove for snow bound area of Himachal Pradesh' SESI
Journal, 7(1): 21-26
[top]
[end]Contents: Boiling Point 42 - Household energy and
the environment
.
|
Improving the environment can lead to benefits
for household energy -
Environmental implications of the energy ladder
in rural India -
Household energy and environmental
rehabilitation - opportunities and challenges -
Deforestation and forest degradation by
commercial harvesting for firewood and charcoal in the Pacific
region of Nicaragua -
Effect of expanding sugar-cane farming on
community woodfuel collecting areas -
Workshop report on urban waste and energy in
developing countries, February 24, 1998 -
Is urban forestry a solution to the energy
crisis of Sahelian cities -
Micro solar lanterns for rural communities in
Kenya -
The bicycle wheel water powered battery
charger -
Community participation in the development of
an improved stove in a cold region of North India -
Commercialization of the Sewa Stove in
Mali
edit this page