| Main knowledge bank page |
Recent additions |
Recent changes |
What links here |
Categories |
Category cloud How-to guides | Organisation profiles | Project profiles | |||||||||||||||
Low-cost temperature loggers as stove use monitors (SUMs) by Ilse Ruiz-Mercado et al.
There is a need for new methods to systematically collect stove use data in order to reduce the reliance on household surveys, which are often resource intensive, rely on householder memory and are subject to bias. In addition, there has not previously been a method to determine the details of use by meal, time, food type etc other than having a permanent presence in the kitchen, which is extremely resource-intensive and disrupts normal household behaviour. This article outlines the use of simple electronic temperature dataloggers that can provide reliable estimates of stove use so avoiding the need for survey information. Because they give precise and unbiased measurements of a simple physical parameter, statistically reliable information is provided using smaller sample sizes than are required for a household survey. [top] [end]SUMs: stove use monitorsThe use of temperature loggers as SUMs underwent pilot testing as part of the CRECER (Chronic Respiratory Effects of Early Childhood Exposure to Particulate Matter) chimney-stove intervention trial in the Guatemalan highlands (CRECER 2008, RESPIRE 2008). The work took place in an area of about 23 villages comprising principally an indigenous (Mayan) population, all initially using wood for cooking in open indoor fires. As part of the studies, selected households were provided with an improved chimney cookstove called the Plancha. This report details the period of weeks after the households started to use their Plancha stoves.Thermochron iButtons® were used as SUMs, each costing about $20 and the size of a coin cell battery (about 1.5 cm in diameter, see Figure 1A). These stainless steel sensors record time/date and temperature with 1°C accuracy up to 85°C. Communication with the monitors is by momentary contact with a special probe, and programming and downloading of the data can be easily done in the field with a PDA or laptop computer (Figure 1B). The SUMs store up to 2048 readings, which can be programmed to be recorded at different rates from 1 minute to 4.25 hours. The SUMs’ battery life is likely to exceed 1 year in stove monitoring conditions if kept within the manufacturers specifications, after which the whole unit must be replaced as the battery cannot be changed. They are easy to use, unobtrusive, waterproof, and tamper resistant.
[top] [end]Pilot studyThe SUMs were programmed to store temperature readings every 20 minutes on a total of fifty Plancha stoves, comprising of 40 newly built and 10 older stoves that had been in use for 4-6 years. In the new stoves the SUMs were installed during the final drying phase of construction, when the householders had been warned not to use their stoves. Thus, the monitoring period included the very first usage of each new stove.Among recipients of the new stoves, 86% had attended hands-on workshops on proper stove use, maintenance and the health effects of indoor air pollution. The SUMs were placed on the tile surface in the back of the stove, near to the chimney base (Figure 1C). This location is the least obtrusive, and the maximum temperatures reached at that location did not compromise the lifetime of the devices. The SUMs stopped recording when their memories were full (approximately 4 weeks) and were downloaded to a PDA in the field within a few days. In a sub sample of households, a HOBO datalogging carbon monoxide (CO) monitor was placed on the wall of the kitchen, using protocols developed for other University of California Berkeley projects. [top] [end]ResultsFigure 2 shows a typical plot of one day’s cooking on the Plancha stove. Note that three separate meals can be discerned.
[top] [end]Patterns of useFigure 3 shows the pattern over several days in a kitchen with both a new Plancha and a CO monitor. Note the high CO levels through Sunday due to the use of the open fire in the kitchen. The small variations in minimum stove temperature reflect the daily changes in ambient temperature in this highland location. On Monday and Tuesday, the family began using their Plancha, as shown by the much higher than ambient temperature. However, they apparently continued to use their open cookfire, as evidenced by the CO readings. By Wednesday households seemed to be using only the Plancha, as indicated by the small amount of CO in the kitchen, due to the majority of smoke being vented through the chimney. The pattern and timing of fuel use and meals can also be ascertained by the temperature profile.
[top] [end]Pace of adoptionIn order to combine data across households for comparison, “stove use” is defined as the total time that the stove temperature is above 30°C. This seemed an appropriate threshold at this highland location to isolate diurnal patterns and temperature increases due to other sources of heat in the room from the temperature increase due to combustion in the stove itself.Applying this stove use definition, Figure 4 shows the daily average hours of stove use over the monitoring period for both new and old stoves. It indicates that use of the new stoves gradually increases over the first few days, stabilising after the first week but not quite reaching the same hours of use as the old stove group.Future investigations are underway to explore this transition by examining, for example, the effect of household size and other factors that may affect stove use. By separating the monitoring periods into weeks (Figure 5), it was found that a significant increase in the median hours of stove use from week one to week two was observed, followed by a period of greater stability during weeks two to three. Although the new stoves display a relatively stable period of use in weeks two and three, similar to that of the older stoves, they exhibit a greater degree of variability despite a four times greater sample size. This suggests that although many, if not most, of the new stove users will adopt the stove quickly after training, there may be a more gradual transition for some users that extends beyond the measurement period. If this is so, there may be a small set of users who might benefit from additional training or other measures. Further research may allow for the prediction in advance of households likely to be in this category based on household characteristics (size, occupation, education, etc.) or pre-dissemination questions about their interest in stoves. Special efforts could then be made to target these households in training or other programmes during dissemination (Rogers 2003).
[top] [end]ConclusionsThe surface temperature of the stove away from the cooking surface might potentially be used as a direct indicator of some aspects of stove performance, for example loss of combustion heat into the body of the stove. Here however, its utility as an indicator of stove use is briefly explored, an important parameter for a range of assessments, including usage patterns after dissemination. It provides an unobtrusive, precise, relatively inexpensive, and objective measure, in contrast to telephone surveys, household questionnaires, diaries and other methods. It thus offers an efficient means to test the effectiveness of behavioural interventions on stove use.In addition, it could provide an objective means to characterise usage over a population of stoves in the context of helping establish the degree to which the reduction of indoor air pollution, greenhouse emissions and fuel use have been achieved. We are now exploring these and other applications. In addition, based on long experience with other datalogging field instruments, we are working to develop efficient and reliable data management and analysis protocols, preferably menu driven using standard software. [top] [end]ReferencesChronic Respiratory Effects of Early Childhood Exposure to Respirable Particulate Matter (CRECER) Study, http://ehs.sph.berkeley.edu/ guat , accessed 24 March 2008.Randomized Exposure Study of Pollution Indoors and Respiratory Effects (RESPIRE), http://ehs.sph.berkeley.edu/guat/page. asp?id=02, accessed 24 March 2008. Rogers, E., 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, fifth ed. The free press, New York. [top] [end]@HEDON
[top] [end]Download the original article Low-cost temperature loggers as stove use monitors (SUMS) (305 KB)[top] [end]Contents: Boiling Point 55 - Monitoring and Evaluation
Categories: Boiling Point 55| Monitoring and Evaluation | |||||||||||||||
Page created:
23 June 2008; Last edited:
17 July 2008; Version: 4 | |||||||||||||||
Pagename: BP55:Low-costTemperatureLoggersAsStoveUseMonitors @HEDON: JUJA | |||||||||||||||







Low-cost temperature loggers as stove use monitors (SUMS) (305 KB)