| Main knowledge bank page |
Recent additions |
Recent changes |
What links here |
Categories |
Category cloud How-to guides | Organisation profiles | Project profiles | ||||||||||||||||||||
Financing watermill upgrades: the business case for scaling up through banking support by B Parthan
[top] [end]IntroductionThis summary report prepared by IT Power presents the business case for supporting the upgrading of traditional watermills (gharats) with improved technology. This report aims to encourage rural and agricultural banks to offer appropriate finance for new projects. The report provides an overview of the technical, financial, social and market characteristics of watermill upgrades.[top] [end]BackgroundThe principal use of hydropower in the Himalayas is through traditional watermills for grinding grain. These mills typically develop less than one kilowatt of mechanical power at low efficiency. Many of the traditional watermills are now being abandoned and the remaining mills face increasing competition from diesel and electric mills.Since 1996, IT Power, in association with the Himalayan Environmental Studies & Conservation Organisation and the Chamoli Watermillers Association, has successfully demonstrated cost-effective solutions for upgrading traditional watermills. These have been developed with the participation of the watermillers and local manufacturing partners; and have been demonstrated under local conditions since 1999. [top] [end]Technology[top] [end]Traditional watermillsThe concept and main components of a traditional watermill are illustrated in Figure 1, consisting of a grain hopper, millstones, water chute and wooden runner. The grinding capacity of the traditional mills ranges from 5–10 kg of flour per hour, with an efficiency of less than 20%.
[top] [end]Upgraded watermillsAn improved watermill has been developed to maximise the grinding capacity of the existing mill-stones at an affordable cost, so that watermills will be able to compete effectively with diesel mills. The upgraded mills have proven capable of grinding at 20–25 kg/hour, typically a three-fold increase. The new runner fits under the existing mill-house and can use the same mill-stones. Figure 2 depicts the upgraded watermill and identifies the new components.
To improve efficiency and durability, the runner is made of metal, comprising a steel shaft and improved bearings. The runner has been designed to achieve an efficiency of above 50% and to have a geometry that is suitable either for casting, or fabricating at a local welding shop. The upgraded mill is intended to operate at roughly 200rpm (revs per minute) to achieve peak output; the traditional watermills run at less than 100rpm.
A limited amount of civil work from a mason may be required to make small modifications to the powerhouse, and to ensure that the intake canal is in robust condition. The new system requires some technical assistance to ensure that the equipment is installed for optimum efficiency, and to train the miller in the necessary maintenance tasks. This assistance can be provided by the Chamoli Watermill Association, who have already overseen the installation of more than 100 demonstration units. [top] [end]Cost estimates[top] [end]Investment costsThe initial expenses for upgrading a traditional watermill are presented in Table 1.
[top] [end]Operation and maintenance costsOperation and maintenance costs primarily consist of the replacement of parts that are subject to wear and tear.As the life of the components are proportional to the hours of operation of the watermill, the costs given in Table 2 represent an average watermill upgrade. The cost of labour contributed by the watermiller himself is not considered.
[top] [end]Market opportunitiesIn the hilly regions, large quantities of wheat and millet are grown and consumed locally, all of which has to be processed by grinding. This was the exclusive role of the watermill until diesel and electric mills became available to offer a faster (but more expensive) service.A market survey of 500 households in Chamoli district, within the service area of two upgraded watermills, revealed that the average household produces between 270 and 350 kg/year of wheat (60%) and millet (40%). Since an upgraded mill should aim to process at least 20 000 kg per year to achieve an attractive income, it is apparent that the market opportunity is for upgrading those mills which can service at least 75 and preferably 100 families. A second essential aspect is that the mill has access to sufficient water to maintain its operations throughout the year, even if processing speed is somewhat reduced in the dry season. As long as the service is quick and reliable enough, local families have shown a strong preference for ‘gharatatta’ (watermill flour) which has the best quality and lowest processing cost: typically 0.75 Rs/kg with payment in kind (known locally as Bhagwari), compared with 1.5 Rs/kg cash payment at diesel mills. There are estimated to have been nearly 200,000 watermills at one time, spread across the Himalayan states of India. Hence the possibilities for replicating the pilot schemes are enormous. A 2003 survey in Chamoli district alone has revealed the existence of 2160 watermill sites, of which 1150 (53%) are still in operation. It is also worth noting that 3 times as much wheat flour is bought from the market as is grown locally. There is therefore a good opportunity for watermillers to import grains from other wheat growing areas of the country and grind them in their mills for local sale of gharat-atta. [top] [end]Social relevanceA survey to assess the social impacts of watermill upgrades was carried out in Urgam, Gadora and Tangsa villages, Chamoli, in April 2003. This involved village meetings, and interviews with individual millers and their customers.
For the end-users, principally women, upgraded watermills were seen to bring benefits in terms of saving both time and money, as well as better quality flour (compared with a diesel mill). Those who had to travel far to the mills had more to gain from a faster service since it could save them a second round-trip to collect the processed flour.
To the miller, the benefit has been a major increase in business and hence increased earnings, and the ability to operate their mill as their sole source of income. The only negative aspect has been among millers of traditional mills who feel they have lost customers to the upgraded mills. These millers have been encouraged to invest in upgraded machines themselves. [top] [end]Business and finance aspects[top] [end]Financial analysisA detailed financial analysis has been carried out on the business viability of watermill upgrade schemes, based on the existing experience with watermill upgrades. An analysis of a traditional watermill business without the upgrade was made to quantify the baseline case. The comparative results are given in Table 3.
[top] [end]Business frameworkA possible business framework for watermill upgrades has been developed based on the rural banking system, the current institutional arrangements for watermill upgrades, and the social and market aspects. A proposed framework is shown in Figure 5, summarized as follows:
The relevance of the business framework was demonstrated in November 2003 when two millers obtained loans from a nationalized bank and a regional rural bank and upgraded watermills. A sustained effort is now needed to scale-up the business model so as to bring significant impacts for the many potential beneficiaries. [top] [end]Conclusions
[top] [end]Download the original article Financing watermill upgrades: the business case for scaling up through banking support by B Parthan (628 KB)[top] [end]Contents: Boiling Point 51 - Sharing information and communicating knowledge
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Page created:
10 June 2007; Last edited:
14 June 2007; Version: 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pagename: FinancingWatermillUpgrades @HEDON: EVEA | ||||||||||||||||||||












Financing watermill upgrades: the business case for scaling up through banking support by B Parthan (628 KB)