| Main knowledge bank page |
Recent additions |
Recent changes |
What links here |
Categories |
Category cloud How-to guides | Organisation profiles | Project profiles | ||||||||||||
Theme Editorial: Entrepreneurs by choice? - or by necessity?
We have seen the human toll the recent attacks wrought in the United States, with citizens from about 80 nations perishing in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania…but there is another human toll that is largely unseen and one that will be felt in all parts of the developing world, especially Africa. We estimate that tens of thousands more children will die worldwide and about 10 million more people are likely to be living below the poverty line of $1 an day because of the terrorist attacks James Wolfensohn The President of the World Bank, James Wolfensohn, spoke shortly after the September 11 attacks in the USA. These were surprising words from the head of an institution that often appears aloof from the needs of the poorest. The World Bank is perceived by some as promoting national and international policies that leave the weakest to suffer the ‘benefits’ of international free trade and globalisation at the expense of local or indigenous practices, cultures and technologies. Much concentration at the level of international institutions (such as the World Bank) and national governments is given to the flow of capital worldwide and the need to mitigate the effects of the irresponsible exploitation of resources that this can lead to (such as global warming). However, it is at the individual and community level that the real ‘environmental’ cost of these macro decisions is felt (an interesting example of this is given in the article by Sinha on the effects of a timber ban on Himalayan rural women).
The fact that there are close linkages between household energy and enterprise is not difficult to explain. Often the only possibility to obtain income for the household, when the opportunities for conventional employment are limited and obtaining funds to invest in risky enterprises is unlikely and undesirable, is to extend household activities to a commercial level. This could mean selling surplus agricultural produce, or selling processed or cooked food. The same equipment used to cook for the household is also used to cook for selling. So almost anything you can say about the household energy environment has implications for small-scale household-based enterprises. Second to the raw material, energy can be the largest expense. Any fluctuations in energy prices, therefore, can have implications for the profitability of the business. It is therefore important for the individual running such a business that energy expenditure is kept to a minimum. A happy consequence of this, in an ideal world, should be a reduced reliance on fossil fuels and better forest management (Figure 2).
Allowing people to keep more of what they earn so that they can benefit from their own hard work and entrepreneurship is a common plea heard from the well off. In fact, those everyday entrepreneurs struggling to control their means of production need every advantage they can get. That may come in the form of less expenditure on fuelwood, kerosene or gas due to improved energy technologies, which helps the environment as well. As the range of theme articles in this issue shows, household energy and enterprise are related in two ways. Either energy is used as a means of production (for drying foods, Batcock and Azam-Ali, for the preparation and selling of street foods, Tedd, Chowdury and Liyanarachchi, and the production of beer, McCall), or energy technologies, appliances or services are being sold themselves (stove programmes in East Africa, Bess, the egaga stove in Nigeria, Obueh, and the Upesi stove in West Kenya, Owalla). Indeed it is quite easy to identify the energy/enterprise link in many of the other articles in this issue, as well as in past issues with other themes. A very quick look at past issues (in this case via the Human Development Library CD-ROM) revealed an article in issue No. 27 entitled ‘Wood Energy Use in Small Enterprises’, in No. 37 ‘Energy for Domestic Brewing and Bread Making, and in No. 38 ‘Improved Tunisian Domestic Bread Ovens: Flying Saucer Lids Save 50 percent Fuelwood’, to name but a few.
[top] [end]References
[top] [end]Download the original article Theme Editorial: Entrepreneurs by choice? - or by necessity? by Simon Dunnett (127 KB)[top] [end]Contents: Boiling Point 47: Household energy and enterprise
Categories: Boiling Point 47| Small Business | ||||||||||||
Page created:
04 July 2007; Last edited:
04 July 2007; Version: 1 | ||||||||||||
Pagename: EntrepreneursByChoice-OrByNecessity @HEDON: JMFA | ||||||||||||





Theme Editorial: Entrepreneurs by choice? - or by necessity? by Simon Dunnett (127 KB)